The Illinois State Board of Education reports that the number of homeless students has climbed over the last few years.
There were 53,733 homeless students counted throughout the state in fiscal year 2016. That number grew by 56,881 by the end of this fiscal year (two years later).
Julie Dworkin, director of policy for the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, says it’s hard to tell why the increase occurred .
“The problem in tracking homeless people, in general, is it’s very hard to say there is evidence that the problem is growing or that it’s shrinking because there are so many factors that can impact the numbers.”
She says the numbers can be affected by how well the schools are staffed in programs for homeless students. Still — knowing the numbers can help determine what resources are needed to address the problem.
Dworkin says, for homeless students who end up moving frequently, falling behind academically is possible … and the odds of dropping out and having emotional and behavioral problems are increased.
Laws prohibiting panhandling not only criminalize those who are homeless, but are unconstitutional, said a coalition of civil liberties and homelessness advocates on Tuesday as they launched a campaign to end the bans in 15 municipalities in the state, including Chicago.
The push is part of a larger national effort orchestrated by the National Law Center on Homelessness & Poverty, which is working with advocates in almost 240 cities in more than a dozen states to press for repeals of panhandling prohibitions. In Illinois, where the D.C.-based nonprofit worked with the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless and the ACLU of Illinois, officials in Aurora, Carbondale, Champaign, Chicago, Cicero, Danville, Decatur, East St. Louis, Elgin, Joliet, Moline, Oak Park, Peoria, Rockford and Urbana were sent letters challenging their panhandling ordinances.
“The ordinance serves no compelling state interest,” the coalition said in its letter Tuesday to Chicago officials. “Distaste for a certain type of speech, or a certain type of speaker, is not even a legitimate state interest, let alone a compelling one.”
The groups say the U.S. Constitution is on their side, citing a unanimous 2015 Supreme Court ruling that calls on governments to closely review laws that regulate speech based on its content. Since the high court’s decision, each of the 25 times an anti-panhandling ordinance has been challenged in court it has been found unconstitutional, said Diane O’Connell, community lawyer at the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless — an “overwhelming batting average.”
“Everyone has the right to ask for help,” O’Connell said. “It’s really kind of shocking that (communities) would outlaw such a thing.”
Panhandling ordinances have been struck down or repealed in Springfield, New York City and Tampa, Fla.
In Chicago, where an estimated more than 80,000 are homeless, panhandling is legally defined as “any solicitation made in person upon any street, public place or park in the city, in which a person requests an immediate donation of money or other gratuity from another person.” The city bans panhandling in various places, including CTA property, and in certain circumstances, such as doing so in a way “that a reasonable person would find intimidating,” including touching people, asking for money when someone’s standing in line, blocking someone’s path or using profanity or abusive language.
“The city of Chicago is dedicated to ensuring all residents have a place to call home and that incidents of homelessness are rare and brief,” said Bill McCaffrey, a spokesman for the city’s Law Department. “The city has made strategic investments to support and improve the circumstances of this vulnerable population, and while we are still reviewing the letter, we look forward to continuing the city’s ongoing dialogue with homeless advocates.”
At the entrance to the Pedway at Randolph Street and Michigan Avenue during rush hour Tuesday evening, some who were panhandling voiced discontent with the city’s policies.
“I think it’s wrong, really,” said Bud Wilson, 60, who’d been seated at the top of the Pedway entrance’s steps for four hours.
As commuters raced by to catch homebound trains, Wilson, clutching a cane, pleaded for change. On a typical day, he makes about $20 to $30 panhandling, he said. He has been homeless for seven years.
Violations of Chicago’s ordinance carry a $50 fine for the first or second offense within a year. The fine doubles for a third or subsequent offense within a 12-month period.
More than 200 cities, including 15 in Illinois, are being warned that their panhandling ordinances are unconstitutional and need to be repealed.
Diane O’Connell, a lawyer for the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, said, “panhandling laws are used to unfairly criminalize people experiencing homelessness for exercising their First Amendment rights. Every person has the right to ask for help.
“There are notable similarities between all of them, but the problem is that they target a particular type of speech and that’s called a content restriction and that’s unconstitutional.”
Since a U.S. Supreme Court Ruling in 2015, panhandling ordinances in 55 cities have either been repealed or struck down by courts.
The letters are a first step. Legal action will follow, O’Connell said.
Locally, the letters went to Chicago, Oak Park, Cicero, Elgin and Aurora.
Following the example of Pope Francis, who opened a shower room and laundry facility for the homeless in Rome three years ago, Catholic Charities of the Archdiocese of Chicago unveiled similar services inside its downtown headquarters Monday.
Services also include access to a clothing donation closet and a variety of social services. The agency also will continue to serve meals to the homeless five days a week out of a renovated and upgraded kitchen.
“Our guests will have comfort of a warm shower, toiletries, bedding, clothing,” said Monsignor Michael Boland, president of Catholic Charities. “These small mercies which most of us take for granted can help preserve health and restore hope to those who live at the margins of society. They can be a first step toward a life of self-sufficiency.”
For more than 17 years, Catholic Charities’ headquarters has been home to an evening supper program that serves sit-down dinners and to-go meals to more than 250 individuals and families five days a week.
Guests who come for a meal on Tuesday night have a chance to sign up for a 30-minute shower slot between 10 a.m. and noon the following day. Each shower client receives a towel, soap, shampoo, toothpaste, a razor, shaving cream, deodorant and a change of clothes. They also will be able to use the laundry services to wash and dry their clothes and bedding.
Up and running for the past two weeks, showers have been booked solid with a waiting list each Wednesday. The agency hopes to expand the program to more hours and days, but that capacity depends on volunteers.
The program at Catholic Charities is modeled after a similar ministry on Tuesday afternoons at Fourth Presbyterian Church on Michigan Avenue. Unlike shelters, both ministries offer bathing opportunities to clients who don’t live there.
According to the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, there are 80,384 homeless Chicagoans, including people who are relying on friends or loved ones for temporary residence.
“Thousands of people are experiencing homelessness in our city,” said Mary Tarullo, the coalition’s associate director of policy. “So we certainly have a long way to go in making sure everybody is housed. Showers are a great step in the right direction.”
“It’s serving a great need for places where people can take care of themselves in dignity,” she said.
Matthew Shay, 27, a substance abuse counselor who handles the intake for the pilot program, said the washrooms offer hope to people struggling with homelessness — both symbolically and practically speaking. Not only does water symbolize rebirth in rituals such as baptism, he said, but hot showers can also bring about a life-giving transformation.
Shay speaks from experience. He struggled with addiction and homelessness for about 18 months before receiving the help he needed from Catholic Charities.
“When they give up hygiene, they’re mentally giving up and feeling hopeless,” Shay said. “So when you provide that to somebody who doesn’t have it, it provides a sense of normalcy that common Americans take for granted. It’s a simple pleasure for us — simple pleasures that are really a privilege.”
La investigación, realizada por UChicago Urban Labs y Corporation for Supportive Housing, combina por primera vez datos del Sistema de Servicios para Personas Sin Hogar de Chicago y CPS. La Coalición de Chicago para los Desamparados sirvió en un comité asesor.
The result is a count that tallies both families identified in the study as experiencing “literal homelessness” — living in shelters or on the streets — and the much larger number of homeless who are “doubled up” in living arrangements with relatives or friends.
Homeless advocates have been urging government policymakers for many years to recognize the needs of the doubled-up homeless. The study confirms families living in such unstable housing situations often end up in the shelter system later. It also provides unprecedented demographic insights into homeless families, which were defined as having at least one adult and one child.
The average size of a family accessing homeless services in Chicago is 3.3 members, slightly smaller than an average city family of 3.4 members. In those families, 70 percent have a single adult female, compared to 18 percent with two adults and just 9 percent with a single adult male.
The average age of the adults in those homeless families was 32, and most of the children were under the age of 10. Half of the homeless families reported having no income or income of less than $500 a month.
Courtesy of UChicago Urban Labs report “Ending Family Homelessness Report: Understanding the scale and needs of families experiencing homelessness in Chicago.” (Provided)
Based on the study, a coalition of advocates led by the Corporation for Supportive Housing urged the city and state to direct more funds toward homeless prevention and to make doubled-up families eligible for services. The study also found that one in four adults in families receiving homeless services report some type disability, typically a mental health problem. Three-fourths of those families had previously sought homeless prevention funding, but were deemed ineligible.
The homeless groups say the city should coordinate its efforts by reaching out to families with students the school system has identified as homeless, both to offer assistance and to keep track of them.
The study by the University of Chicago Urban Labs found that family homelessness falls most heavily on African-Americans, who account for 77 percent of families experiencing literal homelessness and 86 percent of those who are doubled up.
On Wednesday, the city cited its own efforts to end family homelessness through the Families in Transition program as one cause for the reduction. The program has housed 88 of the 100 families that took part, said Department of Family and Support Services Commissioner Lisa Morrison Butler.
Urban Labs researchers project the number of homeless families in the city will hold steady, or see a slight uptick, during 2018.
The piercing whine of drills hitting concrete echoed across Lower Wacker Drive as a person in a homeless encampment tried to sleep nearby.
Advocates with the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless stood huddled as Chicago Department of Transportation workers drilled holes to erect tall black poles that would fence off an area along the site of a homeless encampment known as “the Triangle,” near Wabash Avenue and East Lower Wacker.
“Woah, they’re serious,” Chris Carter, who has been homeless for four years, said when he spotted the six poles Monday afternoon.
Carter, 50, is one of the dozens of homeless Chicagoans who have packed up their belongings and are leaving the area that once was home to about 50 people at a time.
By Monday afternoon, crates, blankets, a few bicycles and trash were left strewn across the damp ground. One tent remained, but bright orange CDOT signs warning that people and belongings needed to be gone by 8 a.m. Monday for construction already had driven most out.
However, confusion persisted when the scheduled evictions didn’t take place. A new sign was posted announcing the Triangle would be power-washed from 7 a.m. to 10 a.m. Friday.
Ali Simmons, a street outreach worker with the Coalition for the Homeless who visits the encampment a few times a week, said the new sign and delayed evictions “make no sense.”
“There’s still people here. They didn’t move. They didn’t make an attempt to move. So I think that tends to support the fact that there was confusion on what was supposed to happen,” Simmons said. “You’ve got two different notices, saying two different things. Why post a power-washing notice for the 15th to give residents notice of this, if no one would be here?”
Multiple city departments, including the Police Department, Department of Family and Support Services, Department of Transportation, and Department of Streets and Sanitation are working in conjunction to fence off the encampment in an effort to target crime. Construction of the fence is expected to take place through June 22.
Diane O’Connell, a staff attorney with the Coalition for the Homeless, questioned the city’s intentions.
“I think that there’s crime that happens all over the city of Chicago, and to take an adverse action against a group of people based on a stereotype that that group of people is dangerous, is discrimination,” O’Connell said.
Two officials with CDOT declined to comment at the encampment or clarify when people needed to vacate.
“I can’t speak to the signs,” said Alisa Rodriguez, the Chicago Department of Family and Support Services’ deputy commissioner of homeless programs. “But what I can tell you is that we haven’t asked anyone to move. Of course the intent is by the end of the week, CDOT will do the work that they need to do, and folks will need to vacate, but no one needs to move now, or not until Friday.”
However, the orange CDOT bulletins posted last week said all people and items needed to be vacated Monday and any belongings left would be “discarded by the City.”
Representatives of the city’s Transportation, Family and Support Services and Streets and Sanitation and Police departments said they could not provide clarification on when people have to leave.
Some people said they hadn’t been informed by the city when they needed to leave.
“I’m just trying to figure things out,” Carter said. “Who is responsible for doing all these things right here? Caging this up because of the homeless?”
The confusion surrounding the deadline creates a risk for people who are homeless who call the Triangle home, O’Connell said.
“If they don’t know when the city is going to finally, actually evict them and take possession of things that are here, it creates uncertainty and it creates a risk that if a person does need to go somewhere and do something, maybe when they’re not here their possessions get thrown away,” she said.
Among the belongings could be medication, personal documents, clothes and more, O’Connell said.
Carter and Terry Mardis, who said he had lived in the Triangle for the past 13 years, were some of the people who had already moved their belongings farther down Lower Wacker.
Carter said he has lived in the Triangle for the past three winters, and with the fence going in, he had no choice but to move.
Mardis, who stood in the Triangle on Monday with a sleeping bag under one arm, said he felt the construction showed the city considered being homeless a crime.
“But it’s not a crime,” said Mardis, 48. “We don’t have nowhere to go. We’re down here to live our life.”
Those at the encampment said their remaining options were slim.
“We’re safer down here,” Carter said. “We go down south there’s shooting down there. We go out west, there’s shooting over there. Go out north, we don’t belong around there. The city is segregated, so the homeless can’t go too far.”
The covered roads of Lower Wacker Drive provide warmth and protection, Mardis said.
Simmons said the Triangle was a place where people have found sanctuary, security and comfort. Building a fence won’t fix the issue in the long term, he said, while affordable housing would.
“Eventually we’re still going to be down here,” Carter said. “We’re just going to move down the street, and go down somewhere else. It’s going to be the same old, same old.”
Rodriguez rebutted claims that the city is criminalizing homelessness and only provides services when evictions are near.
“We’re under Lower Wacker regularly. This is nothing new. Nothing different,” Rodriguez said. “The only difference is that the fence is going up.”
But to Mardis, the fence makes all the difference.
It’s “really hurting me, because we’ve got to go. This is our house down here,” Mardis said with tears in his eyes. “We’ve got to stick up for our rights. And everybody’s got to stand up.”
A city official on Monday talks to a homeless man who lives in The Triangle about services that are available to him as the city slowly begins to move the encampment on Lower Wacker Drive. | Tyler LaRiviere/Sun-Times
By Mark Brown, columnist
City workers moved deliberatively Monday morning to begin removing a homeless encampment from an area of Lower Wacker Drive known as The Triangle.
Unlike the police show of force that characterized last summer’s eviction of tent cities beneath two Lake Shore Drive viaducts in Uptown, Mayor Rahm Emanuel’s administration took a low-key approach to ousting the homeless group that occupies a spot just west of Michigan Avenue.
An 8 a.m. deadline for the homeless residents to move their belongings came and went with no effort to physically move them.
It was nearly 10 a.m. before city social workers arrived to begin offering the last dozen stragglers another opportunity to accept a bed in a shelter or detox unit. They found one woman who took them up on the chance to go to detox.
Only two police officers were on the scene, and they were staying mostly on the periphery. A Salvation Army truck served chili mac and Kool-Aid.
By late morning, however, a city contractor began drilling holes in the pavement to erect fence posts — the clearest sign about the city’s intentions to make the area off limits to homeless people.
Despite the din, many homeless people lay asleep on the ground.
Many packed their belongings and moved down the street to another area of Lower Wacker. Others came and took their place.
A contingent from the Chicago Coalition for the Homeless arrived early to stand watch to make sure nobody’s rights were violated but they didn’t have much to do.
The city has said it is closing the encampment for public safety reasons — both for the protection of the homeless people and for those who live and work in the area.
Advocates for the homeless say the city is just trying to move the homeless to a less visible location away from the busy roadway.
Three months after saying the fences it built along Lower Wacker Drive were not aimed at ridding the area of homeless people, the city has served notice that they will be evicted as of 6 p.m. Friday.
The fences that enclose the sidewalks and loading docks where the homeless sleep will be closed and locked for the first time Friday evening. From then on, the gates will be locked nightly from 6 p.m. to 6 a.m., Assistant Corporation Counsel Alan H. Neff told attorneys for the homeless in a recent letter.
City officials had maintained in late October that they were fencing in the parking areas along the south side of Lower Wacker, ostensibly at the request of building owners, to deal with the problem of illegally parked cars.
And since then, the fence gates have stood open and unlocked, with the homeless continuing to camp out on the sidewalks near heating grates.
Several homeless men who still live on Lower Wacker said city workers or police told them over the past couple of weeks that they would have to move by 6 p.m. Friday. The men said they assume anything they can’t carry with them will be discarded.
But Friday’s planned lockdown won’t proceed without protest.
The Chicago Coalition for the Homeless has invited Chicago icon and historian Studs Terkel to address a vigil at LaSalle Street and Lower Wacker Drive when the lockdown commences at 6 p.m. Friday.
Terkel said he will denounce the move to “evict people from a public space where they have been for years, where they disturbed nobody. What is happening to us as humans?”
Indeed, people have been living under Wacker Drive virtually since it opened in 1926. During the Great Depression, the street was home to thousands of jobless men who dubbed it “Hoover Hotel,” after President Herbert Hoover, whom they blamed for their plight.
Neither the building owners nor the city is taking responsibility for planning Friday’s coordinated lockdown, but if the plan moves the homeless elsewhere, the lockdown clearly will achieve the goals of both.
The city has been trying for years to rid Wacker Drive of its persistent homeless population. Their efforts have been thwarted by homeless advocates who called in the media or filed lawsuits to stop them.
Building owners, meanwhile, have continued to complain about the filth that homeless residents leave on their loading docks and the fear of tenants who have to pick their way past cardboard homes, empty liquor bottles and leering stares to get into the buildings.
With the fences, the city and the building owners appear to have hit on a solution that might work for both.
But homeless advocates had hoped for another answer.
“Instead of solving the problem, they’re moving people out. It’s just moving the furniture around,” said John Donahue, executive director of the coalition.
Donahue said his organization had hoped to ask building owners to contribute $80,000 to a fund to provide temporary housing for the 80 or so people who regularly sleep on Lower Wacker. Once they have housing, they could get other assistance like intensive mental-health or substance-abuse services and job training, Donahue said.
The proposal also suggested that the building owners hire 15 of the homeless–perhaps using them as gatekeepers or maintenance workers for the now-private spaces enclosed by the fences.
The more than 20 building owners paid sums ranging from $500 to $7,000 each to obtain city permits that grant them control over the fenced-in property.
Those permits were issued earlier this month, but the gates remained unlocked while building owners and the city negotiated the details of the new system, said Paul Colgan, a spokesman for the building owners’ association.
One of the street’s residents, Woodrow Wilson, who has lived there for a year and a half, said he plans to stay right where he is. But that may not be possible.
Armed with their “public way use permits,” the building owners can have their security forces remove trespassers, or they can call on the Chicago police to enforce their newly granted property rights.
Wilson said police told him any homeless people still on Lower Wacker Friday night would be hauled off to jail.
Wilson said workers with the city Department of Human Services told him that if he showed up at a West Side address, they would find him a room at the YMCA. But without an income, Wilson said he believes he’ll be sent to Haymarket House, a rehabilitation center–a place he doesn’t want to go. He was offered no other options, Wilson said.
“They’ll just have to take us to jail,” he said, resting in his bedroll Thursday morning.
Romell Smith, 36, who has lived on Lower Wacker for the last nine months, likely will move temporarily to his sister’s home in Elgin.
“They say they’re not doing it because we’re homeless, but because the cars are parked down here,” he said.
Meanwhile, lawyers for the Lower Wacker residents and the city are nearing a settlement on a lawsuit filed last year over a particularly aggressive sweep of the area by Streets and Sanitation workers in December 1997. Under the terms of a proposed settlement, the city would pay $45,000 to compensate residents for possessions lost during the sweep. The deal also was expected to set guidelines for future cleanups.
But the cleanup agreement could be moot after Friday. As building owners take control of the formerly public space, they also take responsibility for keeping it clean, relieving the city of any further responsibility.
Old Firehouse Assistance Center again at center of controversy
By Brittany Keeperman
The city of Woodstock and the Woodstock Police Department have banned at least 17 people from the Old Firehouse Assistance Center.
The Old Firehouse Assistance Center offers meals, haircuts, showers, medical care and social services to people experiencing homelessness. The site operates out of the city-owned Old Firehouse at 120 W. South St. near the Square and City Hall. The McHenry County Housing Authority operates the center.
The ban notices circulated in May after an email sent from Woodstock Deputy Police Chief Jeffrey Parsons to Mayor Brian Sager, City Manager Roscoe Stelford, Police Chief John Lieb and Deputy Chief Ray Lanz. The email was titled, “Top 20 individuals with negative police interaction” and was obtained by the Northwest Herald through a Freedom of Information Act request.
“Below and attached you will find a list of the top 20 individuals who are associated with OFAC, whom we have the most negative police interaction with,” Parsons wrote.
The list includes the reasons for the interaction, ranging from littering to attempted murder to “mental health” or “alcoholic.”
The ban issued to some of those people reads:
“The city of Woodstock has identified you as an individual with numerous violations of city ordinances and local laws, as well as many negative contacts with our law enforcement personnel. Effective immediately, the city has elected to ban you from obtaining services at the Old Firehouse Assistance Center.”
If a person who received the notice returns to the center, “the exterior area” of OFAC or “property surrounding City Hall,” the police department could charge them with criminal trespassing, according to the notice.
People still can receive services at the McHenry County Housing Authority, Thresholds, PADS through Pioneer Center, the Woodstock Alano Club and Family Health Partnership in Crystal Lake, according to the notice. Housing Authority officials said those options weren’t necessarily viable.
“It’s sort of a step back to where we were before the Firehouse existed,” McHenry County Housing Authority’s community services director Sue Rose said. “The services are scattered, and asking people who have no transportation, who may have mental health issues, who may be present at an agency while they are intoxicated … is in essence not allowing them to get the services they need.”
“PADS has closed for the season,” Sager said. “It was determined that we needed to take very solid action, very quickly to avoid the experiences and circumstances that happened last summer.”
People are able to appeal the ban, and city officials, OFAC staff and police officials will meet weekly to talk about the issue, Sager said.
“We will review that list and dialogue, whether the ban should be broader, whether individuals are appealing and should be considered for reversal or have made significant and constructive progress in their transition plans,” he said.
Rose said she understood the city’s position, but the conflict might make matters worse.
“Now they have no place to eat, no place to shower and no place to get the social services they need to try and address these behaviors,” she said. “We don’t support the ban.”
The city recently renewed its lease with the Old Firehouse Assistance Center. An ordinance authorizing the lease agreement cites the city’s desire to control who has access to the site, according to city documents.
Lawrence Wagner, senior attorney with the advocacy group Chicago Coalition for the Homeless, said that Woodstock officials likely have the right to dictate who uses the center because it owns the property. But that doesn’t mean this is the proper approach, he said.
“My initial thought is this is more of the same,” he said. “I understand that any city wants to deal with the homeless population, but they always seem to approach it in the wrong way.
“Instead of trying to provide permanent housing, they push [the homeless] to the side – mainly because they don’t want them to be visible to people in the community who may complain about their presence.”
Wagner said he never has seen another city bar people from social service centers. The coalition is in the process of investigating the way the city treats its homeless population, he said.
The coalition is particularly interested in several ordinances that the city enacted last year related to how long people can stay in public parks and the Square.
“In my opinion, they are clearly designed to keep the homeless out of public spaces,” he said. “We believe right now the ordinances violate the Bill of Rights for the homeless. They seem neutral on the face, but intent and enforcement will violate homeless rights.”